Forced ranking method in performance appraisal
Forced ranking is a method of performance appraisal to rank employee but in order of forced distribution.
For example, the distribution requested with 10 or 20 percent in the top category, 70 or 80 percent in the middle, and 10 percent in the bottom.
The top-ranked employees are considered “high-potential” employees and are often targeted for a more rapid career and leadership development programs.
In contrast, those ranked at the bottom are denied bonuses and pay increases. They may be given a probationary period to improve their performance.
GE, Ford Motor, Conoco, Sun Microsystems, Cisco Systems, EDS, Enron and a host of other U.S. corporations have adopted similar policies of this method
Advantages:
• They force reluctant managers to make difficult decisions and identify the most and least talented members of the work group.
• They create and sustain a high performance culture in which the workforce continuously improves.
Disadvantages
• They increase unhealthy cut-throat competitiveness;
• They discourage collaboration and teamwork;
• They harm morale;
• They are legally suspect giving rise to age discrimination cases.
Click Here To Download Forced Ranking (Forced Distribution)
Whenever a company announces employee training session for skills development then it is supposed to…
If you are planning to immediately resign from your job but you can have your…
If you have been invited to serve in an honorary position at any institution and…
Violating the policy of the company will not be accepted by any organization and if…
Whether it is poor performance or unprofessional behavior that you have experienced at the restaurant…
If there is retaliation that you have observed in a particular team or department then…
View Comments
good